### Closing the Digital Gap: Indigenous Communities and the Quest for Internet Connectivity
In 2020, in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic revealing a **glaring digital divide within the United States**, the federal government pledged to intervene. Their strategy involved providing tech subsidies and an **unprecedented surge of funding** for broadband internet access, specifically targeting underserved rural and Indigenous communities. Among these initiatives was the promise to tackle the **”missing middle miles”** of fiber optic infrastructure that had historically kept numerous Indigenous communities disconnected.
At that moment, this funding represented a substantial investment aimed at narrowing the digital divide. However, years down the line, the outcomes remain inconsistent. Recent census statistics indicate that **only 71% of American Indian and Alaska Native households on tribal lands possess broadband subscriptions**, contrasted with the national average of 90%. This enduring gap highlights the difficulties in achieving digital equity, particularly as access to the internet is increasingly acknowledged as a **social determinant of health**, and a vital component of education, economic progress, and involvement in contemporary society.
—
### Current Status of Internet Access in 2024
The **American Indian Policy Institute (AIPI)** reveals that **18% of residents on tribal reservations are entirely without internet access**, while 33% depend on smartphones for connectivity, which is often characterized by unreliable service. A 2023 research study conducted by academics from the University of Illinois, University of Victoria, and the Center for Indian Country Development discovered that **tribal households are 21 percentage points less likely to enjoy internet access than their non-tribal counterparts**. Even when they have access, download speeds in tribal regions are **75% slower**, and the price of basic internet service is **11% greater**. Although factors like geographic location and income help explain some of the pricing differences, they do not fully clarify the glaring inequalities in access and speed.
This digital inequity has significant ramifications. Research from the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College indicates that tribal members are less likely to receive Social Security benefits, despite experiencing higher poverty levels, because of the growing transition of resources and services to an online format. The broadband divide has evolved into a **hindrance to vital services**, placing Indigenous communities at a severe disadvantage in a world increasingly reliant on the internet.
—
### Funding Developments and Obstacles for 2025
Initiatives aimed at bridging the digital divide for Indigenous communities have been gradual yet noteworthy. In 2009, the federal government designated a mere $179.2 million for tribal territories as part of a $7.2 billion rural broadband expansion effort. It was not until 2020 that regulators established a **Tribal Priority Window**, enabling Indigenous communities to secure their own spectrum licenses for telecommunications. Nevertheless, tribes were still obligated to finance and construct their networks independently.
The **Biden administration’s Internet for All initiative**, introduced in 2021, represented a pivotal moment. This initiative, backed by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, encompassed the **Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP)**, which allocated $14.2 billion for internet subsidies, offering additional aid to tribal households. An important allied effort, the **Tribal Broadband Connectivity Program**, began with an initial injection of $3 billion for broadband infrastructure and adoption initiatives, which was later enhanced with an extra $2 billion. By 2023, nearly $1 billion in funding became available for new endeavors.
Additionally, the administration rolled out a **$42 billion Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) program**, distributing funds to states, and a **$1 billion Middle Mile program** aimed at linking rural and tribal regions to broader internet networks. These financial commitments are designed to decrease costs, boost bandwidth, and widen access, reminiscent of how the interstate highway system once connected isolated communities to the national infrastructure.
—
### The Protracted Journey to Connectivity
In spite of billions allocated for funding, numerous Indigenous communities continue to be unconnected. According to **Matthew Rantanen**, the technology director at the Southern California Tribal Chairmen’s Association, broadband projects often experience considerable delays owing to regulatory processes, rights-of-way discussions, and environmental assessments. “Most fiber projects take four years,” Rantanen noted. “We’re not even halfway through that timeline in most situations.”
This sluggish advancement has led to frustration among lawmakers and the public, who hope for swifter results. “Rome wasn’t built in a day,” Rantanen remarked. “You invested long-term in a solution that will begin to yield results in the coming years. But don’t terminate it before it materializes.”
The hurdles also impact private enterprises. **Julio Figueroa**, AT&T’s tribal liaison for California and Nevada, highlighted that initiating construction on broadband projects can take more than a year. AT&T has collaborated with multiple tribal nations, such as the **San Pasqual Band of Mission Indians**, to extend high-speed internet to rural sectors. These collaborations, although hopeful, underscore the tension between tribal autonomy and dependency on private entities.
—
### The Discussion Around Tribal Sovereignty and Internet Governance
As Indigenous communities endeavor to close the digital gap, they grapple with an essential question: Should they establish and manage their own networks,