In celebration of OpenAI’s decade anniversary, the company unveiled GPT-5.2, the newest AI model designed for ChatGPT. This launch is said to be a response to OpenAI’s “code red” situation, arising from competition with Google’s Gemini 3 and other AI chatbots.
The main competition exists between Gemini 3 and GPT-5.2, with Google’s Gemini 3 drawing interest since its launch in mid-November. The two models demonstrate comparable performance across various metrics, reflecting OpenAI’s competitive stance. Additionally, Grok 4.1 is also a formidable rival, achieving commendable results.
An initial assessment comparing GPT-5.2 with Grok 4.1 is now accessible for those interested. Given that GPT-5.2 is newly released, its benchmark scores are anticipated to fluctuate as a greater number of users evaluate it.
GPT-5.2 vs. Grok 4.1: LMArena rankings
At present, GPT-5.2 does not feature on the majority of LMArena’s rankings, complicating direct comparisons. Nevertheless, OpenAI asserts that GPT-5.2 outstrips GPT-5.1 in almost all metrics, with GPT-5.1 being ranked on LMArena.
Should GPT-5.2 outperform GPT-5.1 in all aspects, it is likely to secure a high ranking on the leaderboards. In the WebDev metric, GPT-5.2 currently holds the second overall position, ahead of Grok.
It is expected that GPT-5.2 will score higher than Grok in the majority of categories, although Grok might retain its second-place ranking on the Text leaderboard, just trailing behind Gemini 3.
GPT-5.2 vs. Grok 4.1: Benchmark tests
Since GPT-5.2 is newly released, it has not yet featured in many independent benchmark evaluations. For the time being, OpenAI’s self-reported figures serve as the reference point, even though they have not been independently audited.
Creative Writing v3 – GPT-5.2 greatly surpasses Grok 4.1, boasting an ELO Score of 1675.5 compared to Grok 4.1’s 1268.6.
GDPval-AA – GPT-5.2 secures a score of 1474, exceeding Grok’s 1041.
GPQA Diamond – GPT-5.2 triumphs with a score of 90.3%, while Grok 4 scores 87.7%.
AIME 2025 – GPT-5.1 notches a score of 95.7% versus Grok’s 92.7%. GPT-5.2 is expected to excel here as well.
FrontierMath – GPT-5.2 achieves a higher level of accuracy compared to Grok 4.
In summary, GPT-5.2 outperforms Grok 4.1 in the benchmarks, though real-world performance may differ.
GPT-5.2 vs. Grok 4.1: Availability
Both AI models are accessible to the public through OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Grok’s platform. Each provides AI chatbot capabilities and image generation. ChatGPT is capable of creating videos with Sora 2, while Grok generates videos and images using Grok Imagine. Despite this, both Sora and Grok Imagine lag behind competitors such as Google’s Veo 3 and LumaAI’s Ray3.
Availability is quite similar, as users engage with ChatGPT and Grok through their respective interfaces. ChatGPT’s integration into a broader array of products offers it a benefit in terms of availability.
GPT-5.2 vs. Grok 4.1: Pricing
Access to GPT-5.2 necessitates a pro version of ChatGPT, beginning at $20 monthly or $200 annually. The free version of Grok restricts access to Grok 4, thus requiring a subscription for Grok 4.1. A SuperGrok subscription starts at $30 per month and can rise to $300 monthly for additional access.
GPT-5.2 holds a pricing edge, as $20 is lower than $30.
Ultimately, the decision hinges on individual preference and efficacy for specific tasks. Benchmarks and costs take a back seat to actual performance for